My lovely wife recently gave me a gift of a new weather station. The remote sensor is pictured below, and as of this morning is securely strapped to the support for the grape vine.
I’ve wanted one for years, but had the unfortunate issue that someone else close to us gave me one that didn’t work very well as a gift and I didn’t want to offend them by replacing it. Enough time has passed now that the upgrade to one that can receive a signal from more than 2m away should pass without comment.
The accuracy of it is probably not as good as measurements made by professional organisations, but even so I’m thinking of starting a daily record and comparing it to the forecasts and (if available) actuals from the Met Office. A quantitative comparison of very local climate data with forecasts would be quite interesting, especially any bias or persistent error in the min and max temperatures.
Weather sensor – temperature, wind speed, wind direction, rainfall
I saw these posts recently on the Real Climate blog, and thought they was interesting enough to repost:
The Early Anthropocene Hypothesis: An Update
An Emerging View on Early Land Use
Apparently, there is increasing support in academia for the theory that human land use clearing and changes after the invention of agriculture were responsible for some abnormal climate trends in the late Holocene, over the last 5000 or so years.
What is the Holocene? The Holocene covers the period from the most recent retreat of the ice until the present day. It isn’t correct to say it started at the end of the last ice age since we’re actually still in one: since scientifically an ice age is when there’s significant ice at th poles, and we still have plenty of ice there for now. But within the current ice age there are interglacial periods when the ice retreats northwards and leaves most of Europe, Asia and North America uncovered, and the Holocene is the most recent of these retreats.
A glacial period, source: Ittiz, Wikipedia
So what’s odd about the Holocene? In previous interglacials, greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere tended to decrease over time, but in the most recent interglacial this was only true until a few thousand years ago. Then levels of GHGs such as CO2 and methane started rising again. This could be explained by some natural change, or by widespread burning of forests and clearing of land and an increase in methane emitting livestock.
If true, this would demonstrate again the exceptional impact of humans on the global feedback systems that normally operate. We partly reversed the usual increase in tree cover and vegetation that happen during interglacials, and accidentally kept the world slightly warmer than otherwise it would have been. The most recent explosion in human impact would then just be an exponential acceleration of a very, very old trend.